The Node is modeled as a sphere to represent a bounded system with a finite interior and a finite boundary.
The volume of the sphere represents stored capacity. Resources, skills, obligations, and internal complexity accumulate in three dimensions. As the Node grows, its volume increases faster than its surface.
The surface of the sphere represents the interface through which the interior interacts with the economic field. All outputs, signals, and exchanges must pass through this boundary. The boundary has limited bandwidth. It can encode only a finite amount of information and action at any given time.
This creates a structural constraint. As internal complexity increases, the surface must expand proportionally to maintain coherence. When volume grows faster than surface capacity, internal states can no longer be faithfully expressed. Latent capacity becomes trapped, signals distort, and coordination degrades.
The spherical structure makes imbalance visible. Growth in size does not automatically increase expressive capacity. Without sufficient boundary expansion or simplification of the interior, Nodes become internally dense and externally opaque.
The sphere is not a metaphor of shape but a model of constraint. It defines how capacity, expression, and stability relate regardless of the Node’s real-world form.
Every economic unit can be understood as a Node. A Node may be a single person, a household, a factory, or an institution. Each Node exists as a bounded sphere with an internal volume and an external surface.
The internal volume contains resources, skills, energy, obligations, and latent capacity. These elements exist as potential. They do not participate in the economy until they cross the boundary into action.
The surface is the interface between the Node and the economic field. Goods, services, wages, prices, and signals appear here. The economy interacts with what is expressed at the surface, not with what remains inside.
The internal volume is composed of informational and energetic blocks.
Latent Blocks represent unused or dormant capacity. These include unapplied skills, idle resources, and unactivated organizational capability. Latent Blocks remain invisible until activated.
Active Blocks are the expressed outputs encoded on the boundary. In a factory, these are the finished goods leaving the loading dock. In an institution, they are decisions, services, and commitments.
Activation is not automatic. Latent Blocks require directional pressure to cross the boundary.
Nodes do not activate in isolation. They move within an economic field structured by Attractors.
An Attractor is a concentration of persistent material demand that generates directional pull. Shelter, food, energy, logistics, and care function as primary Attractors. These forces draw Nodes into alignment and provide the direction required for activation.
When a Node enters the field of a sufficiently strong Attractor, Latent Blocks can convert into Active Blocks. Capacity that remained dormant within the interior is drawn across the boundary and expressed as output.
Attractors organize Nodes into networks. Multiple Nodes responding to the same Attractor form supply chains, production clusters, and institutional ecosystems. Stability emerges when these networks remain aligned with the material conditions that generated the pull.
Nodes are also influenced by Repellers.
A Repeller is a concentration of friction, constraint, or risk that generates directional push. Excessive complexity, hostile regulation, energy scarcity, instability, or infrastructural failure function as Repellers. These forces drive Nodes out of alignment and inhibit activation.
When a Node enters the field of a sufficiently strong Repeller, Latent Blocks fail to activate or Active Blocks retreat back into the interior. Capacity withdraws rather than crossing the boundary.
Repellers reorganize networks through avoidance and fragmentation. Nodes bypass hostile regions, externalize functions, or dissolve existing linkages. The economic network reshapes not by attraction, but by exclusion and displacement.
For a Node to remain stable, coherence must be maintained between internal complexity and external expression. The surface must be capable of encoding the state of the interior.
When internal complexity grows faster than the boundary’s expressive capacity, distortion appears. Bureaucracy thickens, obligations become opaque, and signals lose fidelity. The Node begins to destabilize, not from external shock, but from internal-external mismatch.
Above the material layer sits the symbolic layer: money, credit, metrics, contracts, and abstract representations of value.
In a coherent system, symbolic signals correspond to material activity within Nodes. Each symbol reflects real capacity, real production, or real constraint.
Over time, symbolic structures may drift. Symbols begin to reference other symbols rather than underlying material reality. Financial activity circulates without corresponding production. The boundary projects value that no longer matches the mass inside the Node.
Symbolic Attractors can form. These generate pull without grounding in material demand. Nodes activate in response, but output feeds the symbolic layer rather than the material system. This accelerates drift.
As drift increases, tension accumulates at the boundary. The surface can no longer encode the contradiction between representation and reality.
The system reaches a bifurcation point.
In grounding, symbolic value collapses toward material capacity. Overextended Nodes fail or contract. What remains is the material structure that existed beneath the symbols.
In further abstraction, new symbolic layers are introduced to delay correction. Debt is refinanced, new instruments are created, and administrative complexity increases. This postpones collapse while increasing stored instability.